The Emissary vs Labero and Lurken
posted by Brawn
2000-11-14 20:54:40
<- Back Down to comments Down to last comment
Brawn Firmfoot fights Labero and Lurken
Top of Page Down to last comment


Benny Took2000-11-14 21:14:21
First comment >:D
Deor2000-11-14 21:14:34
Maybe dobbs stabbed him and got him wounded.
Nerf2000-11-14 21:14:37
YOU BETTER POST THE LOG WHEN YOU KILL THE SHIT OUTTA DOBBS THAT LITTLE XP FUCK STEALIN' WHORE!!!
erk sorry for caps
1.Lurken2000-11-14 21:23:49
Im coming back for my guardsman's shirt!
Labero2000-11-14 21:24:30
Nice action-loot. You know that's illegal don't you?
To Labero:2000-11-14 21:32:47
Since when is autolooting illegal?
Korf2000-11-14 21:35:29
sure looks like spamloot to me
Torkild2000-11-14 21:37:22
why didn't lurken leave?
well nice anyways:)
Torkild2000-11-14 21:38:01
Any action in pk situation is illegal as far as i know
Unknown2000-11-14 21:58:55
someone better tell vridush that then eh :p
Healy2000-11-14 21:59:37
Is it also ileagal to sta and ride when zblammed? that can affect in pk for sure :p i mean diff of seconds to sta and ride could make y mountless or take more hits
Vridush2000-11-14 22:19:10
Actions for looting? What's that, really, if you action use action loot, and I loot my way, I still loot first!
grunge2000-11-14 22:32:08
looks like he was spamming get all corpse to me....
on top of that, if you wanna make actions illegal you best look into all
those damn coin eq looters....their spam irritates me anyhow
Nepenthe2000-11-14 22:39:47
Pretty sure that zblam action is illegal, too.
Nerf2000-11-14 22:44:21
Its not illegal to spam loot...yer already dead anyways
Fëagil2000-11-14 22:55:42
I think any1 would agree that looting is one of the main rewards you get from pk, so saying the actionloot isn't pk is fucking BULLSHIT! As long as there's a player from the other side present it is PURE pk-action and you should get demoted for it. Or make it absolutely clear that actionlooting is legal in which case i turn it back on, but until that happens you should get demoted :)
Quillis2000-11-14 22:55:56
Fëagil2000-11-14 22:58:46
And the fact that one of the killers doesn't get any wps/trophy/exp for the kill is complete bullshit too imho. Every1 who part of killing the victim should get exp AND trophy AND wps according to the damage he dealt to the victim. And it should also have nothing to do with someone being grouped or not cause otherwise some silly hobbit prick comes and steals the whole deal from a group who actually killed the victim.
Iff2000-11-14 23:06:52
Oh please... I walk around every night and see instances of
auto looting, flee triggers and zblams in pkill. No exxageration.
Its the truth. If the Gods are gonna let the majority get away 99.9%
of the time, then take it off rules actions and lets quit whining about
shit half this mud does and gets away with anyway.
Grimble2000-11-14 23:07:43
The hobbit prolly stabbed him in the first place. Doubt if Lurken was wounded from xping on mobs in old fnost.
Tindomerel2000-11-14 23:32:10


k 1.lurken

k 1.lurken

KICK ASS :)
To Feagil from2000-11-14 23:42:02
I agree that wps system needs to finally be tweaked and perfected. Its
like they implemented this and then did nothing to fix it. I dont agree
with your other comments. Try solo pkill, Im living proof it still exists.
I dont need a 'group who actually killed the victim'. I can count at least
a dozen kills that were stolen from me in last two days out of retirement
that I had victim down to wounded/bad and some GROUP comes along. Of course,
its like I told Gretna, its a long way from bad to dead if you good player.
But when I get victim to bad and some silly GROUP pricks comes along and
steals the whole deal from a SOLO PLAYER who actually killed the victim then
I agree with you. See my point? I hope so...I wouldn't want to think of you as
stoopid.
Nator2000-11-14 23:42:54
Nice kill :). to whiners: shut the fuck up!!
Niccolo2000-11-15 00:06:05
*cackle* First a log of Labero quaking ... now one of him calling. Petter must be getting soft in his old age!
Zaber2000-11-15 00:39:57
One thing that i didn't understand was, where was 2.lurken?
Tempest2000-11-15 02:21:45
Yea, I was laughing when I saw that too. kill 1.lurken, he's the toughest of the group, as opposed to 2.lurken, who is a wuss.
Brawn2000-11-15 08:32:10
Oki, all of you, who know something about makeing clients, dont laugh at my targeting. :)
I have 2 variables: one for name, other for number. Number is default to 1. and can be increased and decreased with keybindings. So that's why I spam 1.whatever.

About ACTIONLOOT:
I made loot action day be4 yestarday (finally after like 3 years of trying - i couldnt make the client understand the differnce between a *orc* and a orc solong...). The action worked against some newbies BNs and was really annoying, so I turned it off, but it seems I didnt save it in its off status, so I didnt think I had it on and was spamming loot manually. Yes - action kicked when he died.
2) is it illegal? To be honest I prefer if it was :). Sorry if it is. I never understood those two-meaning news messages and multi-interpretated help files.

Conclusion about actions:
I would prefer if management would impress their standings about actions in a more accurate way. Not in the form of mysterious demotions, but in a clear and concise news. Where their standings about tracking with action-keybindings, captureing targets and doornames, soft-actions like eating, looting, zblamming etc were impressed. Currently there is too much rumours and opinions.
Fyre2000-11-15 10:04:36
*nod Brawn*
Rackhir2000-11-15 13:19:02
Ainurs have mad it very clear that all actions that give you an advantage in pk is illegal

And looting all legend eq gives you an upper hand next time you meet if you ask me
Cur2000-11-15 18:01:35
Some gods have said that autolooting coins isn't illegal.
Brawn2000-11-16 07:55:12
Compare Rackhir's and Cur's comments and you see my point...
Comment this:
Your name:


Your comment:

Avaliable characters:
<- Back Post a CommentTop of Page Up to first comment